Combined Management Approach for Gastric & Extra-Gastric Dieulafoy’s Lesions
ADVANCED RESEARCH IN GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY JUNIPER PUBLISHERS
Authored by Mohamed AA Bassiony
Abstract
Introduction: Dieulafoy’s lesions are
under-diagnosed and with considerable rate of re-bleeding. They are
common causes of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. These are 3 cases of
Dieulafoy’s lesion, one gastric & two are extra-gastric. The first
case was an 11-year-old girl presented by recurrent hematemesis &
melena. She was secured by endoscopic banding after adrenaline
injection. The second case was a 19-year-old male who had multiple
recurrent attacks of melena. Initial upper endoscopy was normal but
angiography showed contrast extravasation at the first part of duodenum
secured by coil embolization but another bleeding episode occurred 3
weeks later from an aberrant nearby vessel that was secured by
endoscopic hemoclipping. The third patient was a 47- year-old man
presented by hematochezia. Colonoscopy showed oozing from an aberrant
vessel in the descending colon secured by endoscopic argon plasma
coagulation and hemoclipping. Two days later, all three patients
underwent endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) which confirmed complete
hemostasis.
Conclusion: GI endoscopy plus angiography
followed by EUS is an effective approach for a better management
(diagnosis, treatment & follow up) of bleeding Dieulafoy’s lesions
with a markedly lower rate of recurrence & mortality.
Keywords: Dieulafoy’s lesion; Obscure; GI bleeding; Endoscopy; CT angiography; Hemoclips
Introduction
Dieulafoy’s lesion is one of the main causes in the
differential diagnosis of obscure & recurrent GI bleeding. It is a
vascular abnormality in which a large, aberrant, dilated and tortuous
artery is present in the submucosa of GIT & erodes the overlying
mucosa without obvious ulceration [1].
Gallard was the first to report Dieulafoy’s lesion in
1884. However, Georges Dieulafoy was the first to precisely describe
the lesion fourteen years later in the autopsies of three young, male
patients who died after a massive bleeding from large blood vessels
within the stomach associated with small ulcers, which he called
(exulceratio simplex) [2].
Dieulafoy’s lesion accounts for up to 7 % of cases of
acute upper GI bleeding with considerable rate of re-bleeding ranging
from 10-40% & it may cause massive and fatal GI bleeding unless the
patient is promptly & adequately resuscitated [3].
With the advances in diagnostic & therapeutic
endoscopic techniques, endoscopy has replaced surgery as the standard
approach for management of bleeding Dieulafoy’s lesion with good &
long-term hemostasis & prognosis after endoscopic treatment [4].
Here by after patients’ approval, we present three cases of Dieulafoy’s
lesion.
Case 1
An 11-year-old girl presented to ER with the second
episode of hematemesis & melena. The previous episode occurred 6
days earlier, for which upper & lower GI endoscopy were done showing
no specific cause of bleeding. In that previous episode, the patient
was resuscitated by intravenous (IV) fluid & blood transfusion then
discharged home after stabilization & cessation of bleeding. There
was no history of abdominal pain, vomiting, hematochezia, diarrhea or
constipation in both episodes. There was neither a history of previous
liver or bleeding disorders nor a history of NSAIDs intake. Examination
showed afebrile patient with a pulse: 113 beats/min, blood pressure:
90/50 mmHg and respiratory rate: 18/min. Systemic examination showed no
abnormalities. Investigations showed a hemoglobin level of 7.8 gm/dl,
platelet count of 221 ×103 /dl, white cell count of 9 ×103 /dl, normal
liver & kidney function tests with negative hepatitis markers.
Resuscitation was done by IV fluids & blood transfusion. After
repeated gastric wash with ice-cold saline through a nasogastric tube,
upper GI endoscopy showed an aberrant bleeding vessel on the lesser
curvature 2.5cm from the cardia. Endoscopic injection of adrenaline
followed by band ligation & mucosal tattooing of the site of the
bleeding vessel were done with proper hemostasis.
Case 2
A 19 -year-old male patient presented to ER with the fifth
episode of melena. The previous three episodes occurred one
month earlier, associated with hematemesis of fresh & clotted
blood, for which upper & lower GI endoscopy were done
showing only mild antral gastritis not explaining the severity of
bleeding. For those previous episodes, the patient received blood
transfusion & PPI infusion then discharged on oral PPI treatment.
The forth attack occurred at home on the day before without
medical consultation. There was no abdominal pain, hematemesis,
diarrhea or constipation. There was neither history of previous
liver or bleeding disorders nor a history of NSAIDs intake over the
past one year. Examination showed afebrile patient with pulse:
105 beats/min, blood pressure: 110/60 mmHg and respiratory
rate: 17/min.
Systemic examination showed no abnormalities. Investigations
showed a hemoglobin level of 10 gm/dl, platelet count of 253
×103 /dl, white cell count of 6.1 ×103 /dl, normal liver & kidney
function tests with negative hepatitis markers but positive stool
antigen for H. Pylori. Resuscitation was done by IV fluids. Upper
GI endoscopy was done on the day of admission revealing no
specific cause of bleeding. CT celiac & mesenteric angiography
was done in the next day showing an extravasation from a branch
of the pancreatico-duodenal arcade in the first part of duodenum.
The bleeding vessel was secured by coil embolisation & the site
of extravasation was marked by endoscopic tattooing. No further
bleeding occurred for 2 weeks with stable hemoglobin level on
follow up. However, after 23 days, the patient developed another
attack of melena with drop of hemoglobin from 12.4 to 9.6 gm/dl.
Upper GI endoscopy was performed & showing another small DL
next to the first one at the site of tattooing. The lesion was secured
with hemoclips with no further bleeding or drop in hemoglobin
after 10 months of follow-up.
Case 3
A 47-year-old smoker, diabetic & hypertensive man presented
to ER with three attacks of fresh bright-red bleeding per rectum
over the past 2days. There was no abdominal pain, vomiting,
hematemesis, melena, diarrhea or constipation. The patient was on
metformin & lisinopril only with no recent history of NSAIDs over
the past 3months. He had no history of previous gastrointestinal,
liver or bleeding disorders. Examination showed afebrile patient
with pulse 110 beats/min, blood pressure 90/50 mmHg and
respiratory rate of 20/min. Systemic & local PR examinations
showed no abnormalities. Investigations showed a hemoglobin
level of 8.5gm/dl, platelet count of 196 ×103 /dl, white cell count
of 4.5×103 /dl, normal liver & kidney function tests with negative
hepatitis markers. Resuscitation was done by oxygen therapy, IV
fluids & blood transfusion. An initial ileocolonoscopy was done
on the day of admission during active bleeding but revealed no
specific abnormality & the site of bleeding couldn’t be localized.
The patient underwent colonic preparation with continous
resuscitation & CT angiography was performed on the next day
revealing contrast extravasation from a tortious ectatic vessel in
the territory of inferior mesenteric artery, this was immediately
followed by a second session of colonoscopy that revealed a
pulsatile bleeding vessel in the descending colon with active
oozing & a normal mucosa around the bleeding vessel. The patient
was secured by argon plasma coagulation (APC) followed by
endoscopic hemoclipping with good hemostasis.
Two days following initial endoscopy, all three patients
underwent endoscopic ultrasonography which confirmed
complete hemostasis. After 9-16 months of follow up, all the
three patients had no recurrent bleeding episodes with stable
hemoglobin levels.
Discussion
Dieulafoy’s lesion is an aberrant, dilated & tortious submucosal
vessel, 1-5 mm in diameter that can penetrate & rupture through
the mucosa producing severe & life-threatening gastrointestinal
bleeding [5].
Dieulafoy’s lesion is one of the most under-diagnosed
conditions in patients with obscure GI bleeding. It was first
reported by Gallard in 1884. However, Paul Georges Dieulafoy was
the first to describe the lesion in a series of three patients in 1898
[6].
Dieulafoy’s lesion was described in multiple previous studies
& case series in different parts of the GIT from esophagus to rectum
with the proximal portion of stomach along the lesser curvature is
the most common site for Dieulafoy’s lesion [7].
Endoscopy remains the best diagnostic & therapeutic modality
in most patients although multiple long endoscopic sessions may
be needed for obtaining a definite diagnosis. Contrast-enhance
CT, angiography and surgical interventions are other diagnostic
& therapeutic approaches in patients with a Dieulafoy lesion [8].
The main challenges in management of this lesion were difficult
localization especially during active bleeding and the high rate of
recurrence of bleeding after the initial endoscopic or angiographic
therapy [9]. Here, we described a series of 3 patients, presented
with significant GI bleeding from different sites of the GIT, stomach,
duodenum & colon.
The presentation of our cases was also characterized by either
recurrent previous episodes of bleeding that passed undiagnosed
even with endoscopic evaluation in case 1, repeated bleeding
during hospital admission from a second Dieulafoy’s lesion
after initial therapy by a non-endoscopic modality in case 2, or a
massive initial bleeding from the colon during which colonoscopy
couldn’t localize the bleeding site in case 3.
The diagnosis was mainly by visualization of the site of
the lesion by upper or lower GI endoscopy aided by CT celiac
& mesenteric angiography for initial localization of the site of
bleeding & the type of the bleeding vessel especially in cases
presented by active massive bleeding or poor colonic preparation
in whom the endoscopic visualization is not possible.
The management approach in our case series depended on
using more than one therapeutic modality. In case1, we used
endoscopic adrenaline injection with band ligation & mucosal
tattooing for a gastric lesion. In case 2, we used combined
angiographic & endoscopic hemoclipping with mucosal tattooing
for multiple duodenal Dieulafoy’s lesions. In case 3, we applied
endoscopic APC & hemoclipping for a colonic lesion. All cases were
followed by EUS for confirmation of proper hemostasis & absence
of recurrence. All patients show no recurrence of bleeding with
stable hemoglobin levels after a follow up period of 9-16 months.
Conclusion
Dieulafoy’s lesion is an important cause of obscure GI bleeding
& may be present in any part of GIT. CT celiac & mesenteric
angiography is helpful in diagnosis in addition to GI endoscopy
especially in patients presenting by massive GI bleeding with
difficult endoscopic visualization & poor preparation. Also,
combined endoscopic & angiographic or multiple endoscopic
modalities of therapy are better used in patients with Dieulafoy’s
lesion to provide better hemostasis & reduce the recurrence
of bleeding. Finally, proper hemostasis & absent recurrence of
bleeding can be confirmed days or weeks after treatment using
endoscopic ultrasound.
Conflict of Interest
The Authors declare that there is no conflict of interest &
informed consents were obtained from the patients &/or their
first-degree relatives.
For more articles in Advanced Research in Gastroenterology & Hepatology please click on https://juniperpublishers.com/argh/index.php
For more about Juniper Publishers please click on: https://juniperpublishers.com/video-articles.php
Comments
Post a Comment