Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease, Cryptogenic Cirrhosis and Type-2 Diabetes Mellitus: How are They Related?!
Authored by Abbas Tavakolian Arjmand
Opinion
A growing number of published papers consider the
non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and cryptogenic cirrhosis as
the immediate offspring of Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). NAFLD is the
most common liver disorder in developed countries, where up to 80% of
obese people have the disease. Cirrhosis is defined as the advanced
stages of hepatic fibrosis with characteristic distortion of hepatic
architecture in addition to numerous regenerative nodules. Cirrhosis
without an apparent cause (eg, alcoholic liver disease, viral hepatitis B
& C, autoimmune hepatitis, Wilson’ s disease and so on ….) has been
labeled as cryptogenic [1,2]. After presentation and identification of
metabolic syndrome as a distinct clinical entity and its final outcome,
that is T2DM, the surging prevalence of NAFLD and cryptogenic cirrhosis
was considered as a direct complication of T2DM [3-9]. In a study
conducted by Younossi, of 132 patients with NAFLD, 44 subjects (33%)
were reported to have established T2DM [10]. Of those forty- four
diabetic patients with NAFLD, 11 were reported to be affected by frank
cryptogenic cirrhosis. Going through the paper, the reader would
immediately suppose that, one out of three type 2 diabetic patients have
had concomitant end-stage cirrhosis of the liver. In a review article,
Cusi K. proceeded further up and stated that approximately 70% of T2DM
patients had fatty liver, and the non-alcoholic steatohepatitis was
suggested as the leading cause of end- stage liver disease in persons
with T2DM.The author eventually concluded as if the NASH is the
straightforward “complication” of T2DM!! [11].
In Verona diabetes study from Paris, de Marco made an
utterly confusing statement that, end-stage hepatocellular failure due
to cryptogenic cirrhosis was the fourth leading cause of death in type 2
diabetes subjects. In another case-control study cARGHied out by
Poonawala etal., from forty-nine patients
defined as cryptogenic cirrhosis, 47 percent reported to have
concomitant T2DM.They easily concluded that one out of two cases of
cirrhosis with undetermined etiology (cryptogenic) was affected by T2DM,
and this constellation was presented in such a way that one would
conceptualize that T2DM was the cause and NAFLD and cryptogenic
cirrhosis were the direct consequence [12]. It seems as though these
authors completely ignored the already-settled issue of glucose
intolerance and mild diabetes in most cases of end-stage liver disease.
Contrary to the mentioned studies, in a more reasonable cohort study
cARGHied out in Japanies workers, NAFLD was presented as a strong
predictive risk for T2DM, which means that T2DM would develop many years
after commencement of NAFLD [13].
In a prospective observational study published
recently by our team, a total of 132 overt T2DM patients attending a
university hospital diabetes clinic were thoroughly investigated for the
presence of concomitant NAFLD and cryptogenic cirrhosis. We had the
unique opportunity to cARGHy out the study in a community in which,
alcohol production, distribution, vending and consumption were strictly
banned religiously, ritually and legally. Taking full advantage of this
opportunity, we were able to confidently eliminate the likelihood of
alcoholic liver disease as a possibly neglected confounding variable in
relevant studies conducted in western societies. To our surprise, the
study revealed that, only six percent of T2DM subjects were affected by
mild NASH and less than 1.5% had concomitant cirrhosis or better to say
overt liver failure, of which one patient tested positive for HCV Ab and
the other disclosed later to have been consuming alcohol for many years
in the past once living abroad [14]. Contrary to previously mentioned
studies, there are some masterly designed and devotedly conducted
studies where a close agreement could be found with our study. With the
aim of examining the already reported increased risk of NAFLD and
hepatocellular carcinoma in T2DM, El-serag, et al. [15] cARGHied out a
meaningful case-control study demonstrating that, diabetes
mellitus does increase the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma, but
only in the presence of other risk factors such as hepatitis B or C
or alcoholic cirrhosis [15]. This was exactly what we were trying
to highlight. We believe that T2DM has, per se, nothing to do
with NASH, cryptogenic cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma.
As a matter of fact, T2DM, liver steatosis, NASH and cryptogenic
cirrhosis are all the victims of a prime pathogenic culprit; the
devastating modern- time human health catastrophe, the insulin
resistance syndrome. A must-to-know issue is the true location
of T2DM in the Jigsaw of metabolic syndrome; a matter that
might have been the major source of all partialities and errors
in relevant studies. As a component of highly active metabolic
syndrome, NAFLD and NASH need considerable, persistent
and protracted hyperinsulinemia for vivid development and
significant progression towards the cryptogenic cirrhosis.
Right in contrast to galloping NASH, a state of relative
insulin deficiency is needed to induce impairment of fasting
plasma glucose (IFG) and then overt T2DM. In other words, for
development of T2DM, the process of metabolic syndrome and
hyperinsulinemia must be loosened up or becomes somehow
aborted. Therefore, from pathophysiologic point of view, T2DM
and progressive NASH are situated on the opposite ends of the
spectrum in metabolic syndrome. According to the results of our
study and the previously discussed pathophysiologic principles,
we would reasonably suggest that, if the alcoholic liver disease,
as the major and easily overlooked confounding variable,
becomes practically eliminated from the studies,T2DM, per se,
would seldom cause a deep-seated cirrhosis or fully-developed
end-stage liver failure. We, in fact, consider the rapidly growing
incidence and the surging prevalence of cryptogenic cirrhosis
as the cumulative impacts of alcoholic liver disease and the
damaging effects of unleashed hyperinsulinemia of insulin
resistance syndrome, and in- between the T2DM is an innocent bystander
despite of being frequently seen along with cryptogenic
cirrhosis. It seems as though these authors completely ignored
the already-settled issue of glucose intolerance and mild diabetes
in most cases of end-stage liver disease.
We believe that, T2DM
has, per se, nothing to do with NAFLD, cryptogenic cirrhosis or
hepatocellular carcinoma. The supposition of any pathogenic
link between T2DM and NAFLD is basically erroneous. Along
the evolutional path of metabolic syndrome, from birth to
death, NAFLD stands on the first half of this path, whereas
T2DM gradually appears over the second. NAFLD develops and
progresses on account of conspicuous hyperinsulinemia, while
the impaired fasting glucose and overt T2DM occur once the
pancreatic B- cells become exhausted and the excessive insulin
secretion begins to fade away. Therefore, NAFLD and T2DM are,
indeed, the two opposite aspects of a single pathophysiologic
coin, that is, the insulin resistance syndrome. We would
suggest that, in recent studies addressing the interrelationship
between T2DM and NAFLD, two major background variables
are being neglected; the pervasive and obviously difficult to
document under- reported alcohol consumption and the newlyemerged, worldwide insulin resistance syndrome. In effect, the
horrendous prevalence of NAFLD and cryptogenic cirrhosis is
the summation effects of surreptitious alcoholic liver disease and
the hyperinsulinemic phase of metabolic syndrome, whereas, the
T2DM is an innocent by-stander playing probably no significant
role in the pathogenesis of non-alcoholic liver disease and
cryptogenic cirrhosis.
Keywords: Type-2 diabetes mellitus, Alcoholic liver disease,
Cryptogenic cirrhosis, Metabolic syndrome
To Know More About Advanced Research in Gastroenterology &
Hepatology Journal
click on:
https://juniperpublishers.com/argh/index.php
https://juniperpublishers.com/argh/index.php
Comments
Post a Comment